翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Law Society of Alberta
・ Law Society of British Columbia
・ Law Society of British Columbia v Mangat
・ Law Society of England and Wales
・ Law Society of Hong Kong
・ Law Society of Ireland
・ Law Society of Kenya
・ Law Society of Manitoba
・ Law Society of New Brunswick v Ryan
・ Law Society of New South Wales
・ Law Society of Northern Ireland
・ Law Society of Scotland
・ Law Society of Singapore
・ Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope v Windvogel
・ Law Society of Upper Canada Archives
Law Society of Upper Canada v Skapinker
・ Law Song Seng
・ Law Speed
・ Law Students in Action Project
・ Law Teik Hock
・ Law Telegraph Company
・ Law Terms Act 1830
・ Law Ting Holm
・ Law Ting Pong Secondary School
・ Law Uk Folk Museum
・ Law Union of Ontario
・ Law v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration)
・ Law v. Siegel
・ Law Week Colorado
・ Law Wing-cheung


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Law Society of Upper Canada v Skapinker : ウィキペディア英語版
Law Society of Upper Canada v Skapinker
''Law Society of Upper Canada v Skapinker'', () 1 S.C.R. 357 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on mobility rights protected under section 6 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is also the first Charter decision to reach the Supreme Court since its enactment in 1982.
==Background==
Joel Skapinker was a citizen of South Africa residing in Canada who applied to the Ontario bar to practice law. The bar refused his application as the Law Society Act required that he be a Canadian citizen. Skapinker brought an application to have the provision of the Act requiring Canadian citizenship be held inoperative on the basis that it violated section 6(2)(b) of the Charter.
At trial, the application was denied. However, on appeal the Court held that his mobility rights were in fact violated.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Law Society of Upper Canada v Skapinker」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.